🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously went for the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. But overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.