🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced positive results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."